Today marks the ten year anniversary of the launch of the iPhone. It is weird to think back to how different the mobile landscape was and is because of the iPhone.

For many people the iPhone is the first smartphone.

I know it was for me anyway.

Back in 2007 the launch of Apple’s kind of began and ended in the small backwater of the tech news section. There was no live stream or coverage beyond the handful of tech and smartphone websites.

Hell I don’t even remember how I learned about it.


Where I lived the big phone was Motorola’s Razr flip phone. I remember that because I had a neighbor that just kept buying them. The larger smartphone world was one in which Nokia and RIM (later Blackberry) were the big platforms in mobile. Then Steve Jobs announced a device that brought together, “Widescreen iPod with touch controls, a revolutionary mobile phone, and a breakthrough internet communication device”, into one form factor. And the world is still reeling.

The first device didn’t have an app store and was underpowered when compared to nerdier fare. See the iPhone wasn’t the first mobile phone, but it was the one to cross over. It was the first device to cross out the boardroom and power users to normal people. It opened the way for the modern computing experience we have now.

And it made Apple the Brand we know now.

The aftershocks from 2007 is still being felt. Services like Airbnb, Instagram, Snapchat, and Uber all sprang from mobile. Android was born in reaction to the iPhone. Companies like Palm and Microsoft redesigned their products to compete. It made a few companies retire. It retrained and changed user behavior and expectations. It created a whole new set of software and interface interactions.

It gave us the lines at the Apple store.

So as we wait for the inevitable event that will be the iPhone 8 let’s tip the hat to the OG iPhone.


Half of the time the inspiration to write a post begins out of the frustration of reading online commentary. Sometimes its an opinion I find intriguing; but sometimes its simply because I think someone else wrote some bullshit.

The day Microsoft decided to retrench its mobile efforts I wish I had honestly switched to some cheap ass Android device and called it a day. Because the community that is Windows Phone has descended into madness. There are a lot of angry users who are split between straight up anger and hostility that honestly Microsoft should address.

For example I read one guy just going off about Microsoft cheating users. I get the anger of his sentiment, but I also understand in the larger scheme his and others anger is moot because mobile is a black hole for Microsoft.

The problem for me is that I get and feel the anger, but I also understand why the retrenchment happened.

By the time Microsoft bought the Nokia hardware assets Windows Phone had only one phone maker; Nokia. Microsoft was keeping the company afloat by infusing it with cash. The Nokia deal damaged relations with companies like Samsung (who honestly Windows Phone needed as not if not more than Nokia). The mobile platform was failing to get and retain apps and Windows 8 meant a new and separate app store that competed for attention.

It was a mess.

Was it fixable? Possibly but that isn’t what happened.

Should Microsoft had been clearer to users? Fuck yes.



Microsoft is considering a return to the phone market. And the device they may return with is a dual screen device that can be used as a tablet. Looking at patents the dual screen will provide a continuous screen when in tablet mode. Microsoft detailed a number of sizes for the mobile device in both phone and tablet configurations. They even experimented it seems on a three screen foldable device; but the final version looks to be a dual screen.

This year Microsoft received patents for a series of technologies that together may provide a glimpse at a future device. The patents cover the screen, a hinge mechanism, and two cover the device itself. All patents point to a mobile device that is a combination of a smartphone and a tablet. While patents tend to obscure specific information the accompanying images provide an idea on what Microsoft is considering.


On the surface, this device looks a lot like the ill fated Microsoft Courier. Both are dual screen, touch devices but the Courier screen was separated by a large hinge and was more of a digital notebook.
This new device is a mix of tablet and phone; also the device minimizes the hinge between the screens to create a seamless screen when used as a tablet.
Between the first filled patent in 2011 and the most recent filling, Microsoft has seemingly changed the design of the hinge mechanism. In earlier designs the hinge allowed for a device that opened flat 180 degrees or close. The latest design seems to use a combination of magnates and a flexible hinge to improve usability. In the patent they discuss the various positions which now allow the device to flip the screen 360 degrees.
While this is exciting news it should be remembered that these are patents and companies file them all the time and don’t mean a device is incoming. But based on this and other information we may see this soon.


Last week Microsoft announced a number of new features for the next Windows update and in time I will get to them; but right now I want to the public reveal of Project Neon.

Fluent Design System

Starting with the Fall Creator’s Update Microsoft will be shifting Windows away from the flat, minimalist world of Metro to the third dimension known as the Fluent Design System (FDS).

Fluent Design is an expansion on some of the ideas Microsoft started playing with in Metro, but it is also is the opposite of it. FDS caries on the ideas of the use of colors and for apps to be digitally native, but it’s not the strongly flat thing Metro was. FDS is also not as stringent as the guidelines for Metro was. FDS still draws inspiration from the same sources as Metro did but the world FDS is built for is far different.


Designed for the Surface and Mixed Reality

One of the interesting things I learned about Fluent Design is it was partly designed around the fact Microsoft makes hardware. The obvious one was HoloLens, Microsoft’s augmented reality headset. FDS takes clear inspiration from the device with a focus on depth and materials and scale. But I think one of the other sources is the Surface.

Put bluntly Fluent Design is about creating appealing software and experiences that will make Windows devices desirable. The Surface team has been pushing the hardware envelope but the software has largely languished. FDS potentially fixes that.

Right now FDS will not be a one and done affair, but instead release as a series of waves. Wave 1 is already out with a number of applications using aspects in their apps.

So this is the end of part one. I’m going to post up a series of various images showing the future of Fluent Design soon.

I feel very conflicted about this year’s Build conference. Build is the annual developer conference covering Azure and Windows. This year Microsoft unveiled an ambitious goal for itself along with a new design language; but I’m a bit sour about it.

The fact Microsoft is embracing iOS and Android is not the problem it is the lack of resolution for its own mobile platform. It is clear Microsoft is done with Windows 10 Mobile but it won’t come forward and make the formal statement. It has moved Mobile to a separate branch and the new features from the upcoming Fall Creator’s Update are not planned to appear.

The fact that Microsoft is shifting focus and changing tactics is one thing; not communicating the change is another. I mean at this point the people left using Windows Mobile in the company’s Insider program are wasting their time because their input is irrelevant. And that is a real disappointment.

And I like that Microsoft is embracing all platforms, but I don’t know how to feel about the fact they treat a set of users like non-entities. And it is made all the worse because Microsoft acts like they are doing all these users a favor.


So for me I am only left with questions.


Like does the new design language come to small devices?


Is Microsoft working on a new type of mobile device; and if so who will trust Microsoft to actually buy it?

The title is self explanatory; everybody and I mean every YouTube/Twitter/Reddit commentator and every pundit hates Windows 10 S. The newest edition of Windows is a locked down variant of the operating system aimed at education and ChromeOS. 10 S restricts the downloading of applications to the Windows Store; so no Steam, iTunes, or Chrome.

I get why there is animosity.

Windows users expect to be able to download or do damn near anything to a PC. There are a number of programs that will never (or likely never) to come to the Windows Store. And many see any attempt by Microsoft to move toward a stronger app model as creating a walled garden.

And while I sympathize, I want to call bullshit a bit.

For a long time Windows has been the frontier for good and ill. Its open nature allows for a wide range of applications and devices. It allows a lot of people to find devices to meet their needs and more importantly price points. It also means that there is a wide gamut of things that can go wrong. That same open space has made Windows an attractive target for hackers and crackers (criminal hackers). That reputation for vulnerability made the case for moving to other platforms like mac OS or Linux or now ChromeOS.

Then there is the semi-hypocrisy of parasitic platforms. The programs or services that live on Windows but also live to take you off. I put iTunes and Chrome down as prime examples. They exist solely to bring you in and move you onto their respective platforms.

Honestly the walled garden thing is a bit moot in a mobile world. People protesting that Windows shouldn’t have more locked down platform are spitting into the wind that is the billion dollar smartphone market or the growing presence that is Chromebooks. Also a number of these critics highlight services that are inherently locked down or looking to have walled gardens of their own (Steam/Valve).

From my armchair I look at Windows 10 S and I’m intrigued.

Microsoft bungled some of the messaging around it; and honestly I think they should’ve named it something other than 10 S because its open to ridicule and to differentiate it from Windows 10. Windows 10 S is a sort of update to Windows RT (an ARM based version of Windows) except you can upgrade S to full Windows. It is more secure, faster, and a little lighter. More importantly it operates like Windows. It has Windowing and works with peripherals.

Windows 10 S isn’t for the vast amount of people complaining about it. Also Windows 10 Pro is not going anywhere. 10 S is about making a product that can compete with Chromebooks and a changing market.

Chromebooks are an interesting phenomena because they reduce computing down to the thing many use their PC for; getting online. It is easy to overlook how much work has moved from dedicated programs to web applications. Yes people still used programs that are downloaded but most people use the web. It also moves the PC form factor closer to mobile devices. Windows as it exists now can’t effectively compete with an OS built around being lightweight, fast, and mobile. But a more stripped down version could.

The other change that I think influenced Windows 10 S development is mobile. We live in a mobile age; a time in which the “personal computer” is the one in your pocket. The fact that more work and tasks are done is being done on mobile devices changes how the PC is used. The PC is just another point in someone’s platform.

I think Windows 10 S marks the first real shift in modernizing the platform.

I don’t about everyone else but I’ve felt Windows has been in need of a change for awhile. Something that went beyond branding. The strengths of Windows as a platform have eroded in the face of competition. Mobile has replaced the PC and the PC has become more about the browser. Computing is moving away from the hobbyist stage of DIY to an appliance. A new set of users are growing up with a much different view of what a computer is and how it should behave. Windows needs to be better on performance and security; it needs to modernize how apps are built on its platform. Windows and its users need to be brought into the 21st century (kicking and screaming if need be).

Windows is missing out on it and will continue if it doesn’t change.



In the past 48 hours I have done a lot of thinking about the Microsoft Surface Laptop and Windows 10 S. I have also read a few opinion pieces and watched video hands on. There is a lot of opinions about the device and how it fits within the Windows ecosystem; about how it changes or doesn’t changes things.

So I thought I put in my 2 cents.


The Surface Laptop on first glance looks like a matchup of the Surface Book’s screen and a Surface Type Cover. The Laptop’s profile and body has these angles that work to hide the lower half given the allusion its just a screen and keyboard. The colored versions only come with middle tier models; that may upset some. The lack of USB Type-C or the Thunderbolt connector of the same shape will be one the major dings facing the Surface Laptop. The argument being these things are the future (even though it is not the case now).

The Surface Laptop’s profile when open really reminds me of the profile of the Surface Pro. The device’s screen is incredibly clear. You know it’s a good, crisp screen if it works well on camera. In terms of the Surface family the Laptop is quite conservative. It doesn’t fit into the tablet PC mode of the Pro or Book, but it does fit the name Surface. The colors chosen for the Surface Laptop are a good balance; they aren’t too bold to be considered toy-like but aren’t so muted as to be barely there. As interesting as it would be to see this notebook as one those 2-in-1 devices that flips, it’s intriguing to see the Surface team’s take on the clamshell design. It sort of like watching a comedian in a dramatic role; they are following the script but bringing another perspective.

For example the last few years has seen a number of thin and light designs for PC laptops that have pushed the boundaries. From Lenovo’s Yoga and its jeweled hinge to Dell’s XPS 13 and its near bezel-less screen to Hewlett-Packard’s svelte Specter. PCs have been getting better designs across the board. The Surface Laptop isn’t as flashy. The laptop’s most daring features is the Alcantara layer sitting on top the keyboard and the fact it runs Windows 10 S. Of course there are innovations such as putting the SSD on the same motherboard as the Intel chip, but where Surface excels at is in eliciting a response. With Surface Microsoft built a brand; they built something that works on an emotional plane. I mean for me the Surface devices have been coveted items. There is something to buying a device built for the software it runs. Inherent in buying a Surface device is buying into the design; into the notion of a tablet that can replace your laptop.  Its buying a device from people you think give a damn about you loving what they made.

The Surface Laptop is a desirable object; I want but I can’t afford it and its quirks I gladly try to fit in my computer usage.

There are some issues. Like I wished Microsoft would have made a fan less Core M version. I know there are power freaks out there, but I’m all about no fans. Secondly I was thinking the device would be smaller. Like 10-11 inches. Lastly I’m surprised there was no talk of an LTTE model. The USB thing to me is not a big deal and this running Windows 10 S isn’t a hurdle either. Actually the other thing is I wish colors were available for all models.

And that’s about it. Hopefully I will get a hands on (aka playing with the demo model at a Best Buy).